Subscribe
Join the PCN mailing list.
Archives Policy Submissions
AllAgricultureCanadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA)Chemical AssessmentFoodForestryHerbicidesInsecticidesIntegrated Pest ManagementNuclear WastePesticidesPetrochemicalsPlasticPolyaromatic HydrocarbonsRisk AssessmentTelecommunications & RadiationToxic MetalsTransparencyWaste
Toward a Sustainable Agriculture Strategy
Sustainable farming is essential to maintain food supplies and to sequester carbon in the soil, in the face of climate change. Farmers need support to implement tools of organic regenerative agriculture, supported by wetlands and hedge-rows or shelter belts for biodiversity.
Re: Chlorpyrifos updated environmental risk assessment (PRVD2019-05)
Chlorpyrifos is an insecticide that emerged from WW II nerve gas chemistry. It damages the nervous system - even young brains even before babies are born - and can cause cancer.
London ON Council, please deny an uninsurable, unethical 5G Pilot Project experiment
Amending the Canadian Environmental Protection Act for 2022 and Beyond
The Right to a Healthy Environment will only be realised if CEPA is amended to enable the best choices to be made regarding substances and technologies. Permitting everything that slips under a poorly assessed or enforced regulatory bar enables pollution and climate chaos.
Followup of Bill S-5 NGO testimony to ENVI
Protecting human and environmental health requires recognizing characteristics of hazardous chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity. The list prescribed in CEPA, is decades old. We discusses how increases in chronic diseases and cancers seen in Canadians match missing toxicity endpoints. CEPA’s definitions must reflect modern science.
Tiafenacil Notice of Objection
Letter to PMRA re. suspension of glyphosate product renewals
Comments on proposed glyphosate maximum residue limits (PMRL 2021-10)
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation investigation belongs in CEPA
Federal civil servants stated that other legislation meant that environmental data collection and research on environmental protection against radiofrequency radiation is unnecessary. Our investigation confirms that there is NO environmental science or protections against this novel, rapidly escalating, harmful environmental agent.