Join the PCN mailing list.
Rare agreement between advocates for safer wired networks and telecommunications companies emerged in responses to an Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) Consultation on a Policy and Licensing Framework for Spectrum in the 26, 28 and 38 GHz Bands.
Submissions from telecommunications companies encouraged ISED to postpone the millimetre wave (mmWave) auction.
Rogers Communications stated: “At this time, the equipment ecosystem and business cases for mmWave spectrum are not mature enough to justify significant deployments in most locations.”
Quebecor Media, one of the larger regional telecommunications providers, states clearly: “holding this auction in 2024 is premature.”
U.S. operators are backtracking on mmWave investments, because mmWaves pose important limitations compared to microwaves presently used for wireless connectivity.
Rogers stated: “Patchy performance is the result of weak signal propagation and the ubiquitous presence of buildings and trees that block mmWave signals in urban settings.” Further, 5G requires denser, expensive deployments of small cells. They cited a U.S. report that, “the average radius per small cell site was only 500 feet for line-of-sight communication, and much less (just 50 feet in one case) where there were obstructions.”
Experts also warn that some bands will compromise weather forecasting and climate monitoring—this can and must be avoided.
Remarkably, 270 individuals successfully submitted comments, with 100% opposing the auction of extremely high frequency spectrum.
Many echoed the call by Canadian experts and leading citizens’ groups for a moratorium on the release of mmWave spectrum for 5G expansion, that is supported by six reasons:
Individuals discussed human and ecological health, including personal injuries from exposures to wireless radiation. Impacts of these pulsed signals can include long-term disability, and isolation from everyday environments with cellular network coverage. Others reported cancers associated with wireless radiation.
Canada is hosting the UN Convention on Biodiversity COP 15 in December, but Canada completely lacks environmental protection against radiofrequency radiation. An authoritative, review (Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3) with over 1000 references summarizes how plummeting biodiversity is in part a substantial consequence of escalating wireless radiation, as it ticks past a quintillion (1,000,000,000,000,000,000) times historical ambient levels.
At stake is competition for the “wireless last mile.” Canada’s digital highway should be fibre-optic cable to all premises, built once and shared by all providers.
Fibre is the superior choice. It is sustainable, scalable and renewable, offering higher speed and greater capacity, predictable performance, lower maintenance costs, and a longer technological lifetime than fixed-wireless technologies. Importantly, fibre is safe. It is the most future-proof option for communications and information technologies; indeed, ISED is spending millions of dollars on fibre for rural broadband.
Industry is in no rush to deploy mmWaves.
First, we must: understand long-term health and environmental impacts of this technology; develop demonstrably safe human and environmental exposure limits; and establish transparent emissions monitoring and industry compliance enforcement.
It is crucial to get this right NOW as we face the twin crises of biodiversity loss and climate change.